Characteristics of benthic maps are controlled by the spatial and thematic resolutions used in map production. The implications of these production decisions on the inferences that can be drawn from the maps are poorly understood. I addressed this need by quantifying the differences among common map types, considering how map type affects inferences of fish and benthic communities at the patch level, and then evaluating the influence of map type on ecological neighborhood analysis of reef fish. Results indicated that hard bottom types, especially patch reefs and colonized pavement, were among the most sensitive to changes in spatial resolution of maps. In contrast, linear reef and continuous seagrass features were characterized quite consistently regardless of spatial resolution. Multivariate analyses indicated that both the fish assemblages and benthic characteristics of reef types overlapped considerably. In contrast, shelf position (inside versus outside of lagoons) showed clear differences in both environmental variables and fish assemblage composition. In general, the results of multivariate analyses suggest that knowledge of the overall fish assemblage or fine-scale environmental characteristics could not be used to predict reef type or vice versa. Furthermore, spatial scale of benthic maps did not affect results when analyses were conducted at the patch level. In addition, a multi-scale landscape analysis was conducted wherein correlations between fish assemblages and surrounding landscape variables were measured using univariate linear regression for a range of scales between 25 and 800 m. The strength of the associations as a function of scale exhibited one of 6 response curve forms and was used to identify the scale that best correlates fish with their surrounding habitat. In these analyses, individual landscape variables explained a maximum of only 25% of the variability in fish distributions. Use of different input maps in many of these analyses resulted in a changed perception of either the strength of peak correlation at a given scale, or the scale at which peak correlations occurred. Overall, the findings revealed which aspects of coral reef ecosystems are sensitive to map scale and advise scientists and managers on map production and use in similar settings.
|Advisor:||Miller, Thomas J.|
|Commitee:||Eggleston, David B., Gardner, Robert H., Monaco, Mark E., Reaka-Kudla, Marjorie L.|
|School:||University of Maryland, College Park|
|School Location:||United States -- Maryland|
|Source:||DAI-B 70/06, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Coral reefs, Landscape ecology, Reef fish|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be