Understanding neural adaptations to training, and their relation to functional improvements, plays an important role in designing and evaluating training programs. Neural adaptations to strength training have yet to be completely characterized, with disagreement regarding the role of motor cortex (M1). Unlike skill training, which is consistently associated with an increase in excitability and a decrease in inhibition within M1, adaptations to strength training are equivocal. There is evidence that rate of muscle-activation (ROA) used during a training protocol may influence M1 plasticity. In the present study, the role of ROA on acute, neural adaptations to a single session of strength training was evaluated.
Thirty subjects participated in a single session of maximal, isometric knee extension testing and training. Subjects were randomized into groups that were tested with high ROA and trained with high ROA (Ballistic), low ROA (Ramp), or did not train (Control). Changes in performance (maximal torque, maximal rate of torque development, muscle activation) were assessed during training and 24 hours after. Transcranial magnetic stimulation, femoral nerve stimulation, and short-interval intracortical inhibition were used to assess changes in corticospinal tract (CST) excitability, spinal reflex excitability, and M1 inhibition for rectus femoris during training and 24 hours after.
All three groups improved rate of torque development, with Control apparently due to training effects of the test contractions. Neural adaptations were also similar among groups. Training/testing resulted in an immediate depression of resting M1 excitability, which recovered within ten minutes, and no change in CST excitability during voluntary muscle activation. Training/testing was also associated with increased spinal reflex excitability during voluntary muscle activation, but not rest. M1 inhibition did not change during training. After 24 hours, CST excitability and spinal reflex excitability had returned to baseline levels, but intracortical inhibition was decreased.
These results indicate that strength training, even when performed with a high ROA, is associated with different neural adaptations than skill training. Though the acute M1 response to strength training differed from skill training, the next day decrease in inhibition indicates that M1 does play a role in learning subsequent to strength training.
|Advisor:||Darling, Warren G., Ladouceur, Michel|
|Commitee:||Cole, Kelly J., Frey Law, Laura A., Shields, Richard K.|
|School:||The University of Iowa|
|School Location:||United States -- Iowa|
|Source:||DAI-B 70/05, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Muscle activation, Neural adaptations, Plasticity, Resistance training, Skill training, Strength training, Transcranial magnetic stimulation|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be