Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

The milk of human kindness: Social welfare and breastfeeding policy in the United States
by Kimmel, Tina, Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley, 2007, 199; 3275471
Abstract (Summary)

Breastfeeding is valuable and worth protecting, promoting, and supporting. Yet, social welfare in the United States does not take it into consideration.

Mother's milk nourishes perfectly; it is a miraculous substance. Formula is a poor substitute which causes short and long-term disability and infections, chronic diseases, plus other health effects for both mother and infant, including death. There are also troubling psychosocial consequences of formula use, including lower intelligence, poorer maternal-infant attachment, and possibly increased child abuse.

The excess costs associated with formula-feeding average $400 per child. This means as much as $3B a year is spent unnecessarily annually nationwide on formula, illness, and special education. The value of the lives of infants who die due to formula-related illnesses can also be calculated.

Although rates of exclusive formula-feeding are falling, they are still at 30% overall. Aggressive marketing tactics by formula companies are likely to blame for even higher prevalence among low-income, less educated, and minority families.

State and federal bodies and laws protect breastfeeding. For example, breastfeeding is allowed on any Federal property a mother may be. Some states have laws which include a right to breastfeed anywhere, the right to take breaks at work to breastfeed or pump, and the right to breastfeed immediately at birth. More are needed.

Many policy areas could use improvement, such as in maternity hospitals, where formula marketing still takes place, and low maternal-newborn contact is still the norm. Medical and government policy should support family cosleeping and put an end to circumcision, both of which would increase breastfeeding success.

The American Academy of Pediatrics and other professional groups, some corporations, and ethicists have breastfeeding-supportive policies. But the National Association of Social Workers, and the National Association of Perinatal Social Workers, do not.

Child welfare and family support policies need to change to support breastfeeding. An analysis using CDC's Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) to determine whether the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program (TANF) caused a rise in formula-feeding was inconclusive, but other evidence suggests that it did. Exemption from TANF work requirements should be granted for breastfeeding. This policy would reward healthy breastfeeding behavior in the mothers who most need our support and encouragement.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor: Runyan, William McKinley
Commitee:
School: University of California, Berkeley
School Location: United States -- California
Source: DAI-A 68/08, Dissertation Abstracts International
Source Type: DISSERTATION
Subjects: Social work, Public administration, Welfare
Keywords: Breastfeeding policy, Formula feeding, Public policy, Social welfare policy
Publication Number: 3275471
ISBN: 9780549167891
Copyright © 2019 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy
ProQuest