Part of the Latin Project1, the current study investigates the relationship between individual differences (Level of Bilingualism) and pedagogical conditions (Types of Feedback) as it affects L3 development. The design includes working memory (WM) capacity and learning strategies as moderator variables to explain the effects identified. This laboratory study looks at 90 L1 Mandarin/L2 English bilinguals as they interact with a computer lesson on assignment of semantic functions in L3, Latin. Overall, the current study supports previous studies (e.g., Alanen, 1995; Carroll & Swain, 1993; de Graaff, 1997; DeKeyser, 1995; Ellis, 1993; Nagata, 1993; Nagata & Swisher, 1995) showing that more explicit feedback is more effective than less explicit, “right” or “wrong” feedback. The results support Cummins’ Threshold Hypothesis (1976) as they identify a threshold between the intermediate and beginning L2 levels at which the benefits of the bilingual experience appear. However, the results also suggest that the appearance of bilingual advantages depend on the complexity of the tasks performed (Bialystok, 1986, 1988, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2004, 2008). Specifically, the results support Lado (2008) and Sanz, Anfruns, Lado, Lin, and Medina (2005a) showing that participants at a higher L2 level outperformed their counterparts only in the less explicit condition, and that more explicit feedback may level out differences among learners at different L2 levels.
Different results identified by repeated measures ANOVAs and ANCOVAs revealed a key role for WM capacity and Learning Strategies in L3 development. The current study supports the more the better hypothesis (Miyake & Friedman, 1998) according to which, having higher WM capacity helps learning and domain-generality hypothesis (e.g., Turner & Engle, 1989), as WM capacity does not seem to be language dependent. The results also suggest that sentence span, computational span, and speed of processing tests are more suitable WM measures than non-word recall and digit backward tests. Lastly, different results identified by repeated measures ANOVAs and ANCOVAs in the current study revealed a relationship between Learning Strategies and L3 development: Specifically, between Compensation Strategies and L3 development, and between Metacognitive Strategies and L3 development. Importantly, the results support previous studies on strategies showing that participants at a higher proficiency level use strategies more frequently than their counterparts, and extend the findings of Wharton (2000) and Kemp (2007) to the initial L3 development in a laboratory environment with participants of different L2 proficiency levels in an EFL context.
|Commitee:||Connor-Linton, Jeff, Howard, Darlene|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 70/03, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Bilingual education, Linguistics, Cognitive psychology|
|Keywords:||Bilingualism, Feedback, Foreign language, Learning strategies, Third language, Working memory|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be