This thesis takes a new look at one of the oldest and most widely acknowledged (if not followed) principles of international humanitarian law - the civilian immunity principle. Unfortunately, the civilian immunity principle is ignored in most modern conflicts, signaling that international humanitarian and human rights law may not be effective. Using feminist and gender theory, this thesis will explore the conflicts in Côte d'Ivoire, Afghanistan, and Nepal to determine why international law is ineffective in guaranteeing the civilian immunity principle. This thesis will conclude that the law is ineffective because of inadequate enforcement and because the exclusive nature of the law. It will determine that more focus on gender and empathy is needed to improve the effectiveness of the law of armed conflict.
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||MAI 47/05M, Masters Abstracts International|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be