The criterion related validity of the Children's Functional Assessment Rating Scale (CFARS) was examined by comparing the assessment's selected scores to the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) selected scores taken from child psychological evaluations in a Pennsylvania wraparound program. There is no clear evidence that a study has attempted to determine the CFARS criterion related validity using a correlation between the CFARS and norm-referenced measure (e.g., the CBCL) for validation purposes. Therefore, scores from the relatively new CFARS and the norm-referenced CBCL were collected and analyzed at two different time points in order to determine if there was a significant correlation. This quantitative study used archived scores from 91 child and adolescent participant evaluations. There are seven domains from each assessment that are similar and CBCL t-scores and CFARS severity scores for the domains were compared using a Pearson correlation analysis. The results indicated that all seven domains of the CFARS showed significant correlation to all seven domains of the CBCL at both time points. Therefore, the results of the data analysis from the seven select domains help further understand the criterion related validity of the CFARS through validation against the norm-referenced CBCL. Conclusions of this study were discussed and there are recommendations for future research. Based on the results, this study should help introduce more psychologists and clinicians to the CFARS assessment tool, which is already being used in several states with success.
|Commitee:||Harris, Sandra, Trunk, Barry|
|Department:||School of Psychology|
|School Location:||United States -- Minnesota|
|Source:||DAI-B 69/07, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||CBCL, CFARS, Child Behavior Checklist, Children's Functional Assessment Rating Scale, Wraparound|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be