This research project has been motivated by the question of whether a nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) can be accepted as an unequivocal measure of welfare. Although the assumed link between the general welfare of a society and its GDP has become one of the most pervasive tenets of our culture, it is now widely recognised that GDP, which was not designed to measure welfare, is an imperfect and insufficient proxy. Several modifications have been proposed in response. Those, however, attempt to rectify the shortcomings of GDP while remaining loyal to the flawed conceptual framework of the system of national accounts. Non-economic strands of research, particularly those associated with the so-called social indicators movement, have taken a decidedly different direction. Numerous attempts have already been made to define and directly measure welfare. The project is primarily concerned with this research camp, whose intellectual history is reviewed in some detail. In the process, a generic theory of multidimensional individual welfare is derived and proposed as the theoretically and methodologically soundest alternative. Confronting it with empirical evidence from the British Household Panel Survey (1991-2004) reveals that social reporting on multidimensional concepts entails formidable methodological challenges. In view of that, most of the empirical part of this thesis is dedicated to exploring the feasibility and usefulness of various types of summary measures. The novelty of this research project lies in its systematic exploration of available longitudinal survey data for purposes hitherto largely neglected by the British sociological community and the public statistics establishment. By importing both tested and novel concepts into the context of British survey research for the first time, it provides more accurate and more detailed insights into the distribution and change of individual welfare in contemporary British society than commonly considered. The unavoidable shortcomings of secondary analysis notwithstanding, the findings could enrich social theory in the widest sense and the political welfare discourse (both substantively), as well as current social reporting practice (methodologically).
|School:||The University of Manchester (United Kingdom)|
|Source:||DAI-A 70/03, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Social research, Public policy, Social structure|
|Keywords:||British Household Panel, Gross domestic product, Individual welfare, Social indicators, Social reporting, Survey data, Welfare index|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be