Motivational interviewing is a brief non-confrontational intervention designed to enhance motivation to reduce harmful behavior (Miller & Rollnick, 2002). The purpose of this study was to conduct the first trial of motivational interviewing as a targeted prevention for partner aggression. Participants were 50 college dating couples between 18 and 25 years-old who reported at least one act of male-to-female mild physical aggression in the preceding three months. All couples completed a two-hour assessment session. Half of all couples were then randomly assigned to receive a two-hour individualized motivational feedback session, and the remaining couples received brief, generalized, non-motivational feedback.
Results indicated that the motivational feedback intervention led to significant reductions in mild physical aggression, harmful alcohol use, and acceptance of female psychological aggression compared to the brief feedback condition. Reductions in physical aggression were predicted by reductions in psychological aggression as well as by reduced acceptance of male and female psychological aggression. Reduction in physical aggression predicted improved investment in the relationship across treatment conditions, and was also related to less anxiety and greater optimism about the future of the relationship for couples in the motivational feedback condition only. Levels of physical aggression did not predict relationship dissolution, but lower commitment to the relationship by females and higher motivation to change by males did predict dissolution.
Across feedback conditions, reductions in psychological and physical aggression were predicted by reductions in beliefs about the normativeness of male psychological aggression and female physical aggression and decreased acceptance of female physical aggression. Further, reductions in psychological aggression were predicted by decreased beliefs in the normativeness of female psychological aggression, increased need and want to change aggressive behaviors, and decreased beliefs about the ability to change. There were no significant direct mediations between feedback condition and changes in aggression using these potential mechanisms of change, although reductions in the acceptability of psychological aggression by both males and females seemed to serve as a link between feedback condition and other mechanisms. Therapists higher in global empathy, reflection to question ratios, and lower in use of closed questions during the motivational feedback sessions led to greater reductions in physical aggression.
The current study was the first trial of motivational interviewing as a targeted prevention for dating aggression. The results of this study suggest that motivational interviewing is a promising approach to reducing dating aggression and improving relationship functioning and individual well-being.
|School:||State University of New York at Stony Brook|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-B 69/10, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Social psychology, Clinical psychology, Criminology|
|Keywords:||Alcohol abuse, College students, Dating couples, Intimate partner violence, Motivational interviewing, Prevention, Therapy|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be