Di Lollo, Enns, and Rensink's (2000) object substitution theory of common-onset masking (COM) was tested relative to other masking theories' attempts to explain masking in the common-onset paradigm (COP). Five experiments were conducted to determine the impact that object priming (i.e., priming the object shape outlined by the mask patterns used in COP) would have on object substitution. In Experiment 1, the magnitude of masking observed was increased when the shape of the mask pattern was primed (hereafter referred to as the Primed Mask Effect: PME). Experiment 2 replicated the PME and produced data that suggested that the visual recognition system may be orientation-free (i.e., objects can be rotated during the recognition process). Experiments 3 through 5 explored the role of reorientation in order to determine the necessary conditions for object priming and the PME. It was found that for object priming and PME to occur, it must be possible to reorient the mask patterns so they produce one abstract representation common to both mask patterns. It is believed that this situation allows the participant to search for a specific shape. Thus successful search becomes contingent on the masking stimulus matching the representation within the participant's search set. As a result of these findings, it was possible to differentiate the object substitution theory of masking from other theories of masking. In addition, it was possible to offer refinements to Di Lollo et al.'s computational model of object substitution (CMOS). Findings are discussed in relation to object substitution, CMOS, and other perceptual explanations of object priming and COM.
|Advisor:||Neill, W. Trammell|
|School:||State University of New York at Albany|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-B 69/01, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Psychology, Experiments, Cognitive therapy|
|Keywords:||Attention, Masking, Object substitution, Pattern recognition, Priming, Visual perception|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be