This dissertation is meant to determine if Benjamin Franklin's axiom, "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure", holds true when it comes to preventing crime. The primary focus of the research is the direct, out of pocket, cost to taxpayers for chronic, serious, and violent offenders. The direct taxpayer costs measured at the municipal, county, state and federal levels of government include law enforcement, prosecution, public defense, court costs, incarceration, out of home placement of children in need of protection as a result of a parent being incarcerated, and probation. Taxpayer costs avoided are provided from age 10 through age 25 and are broken down by activity and level of government. If a cost, either tangible or intangible, could not be directly linked to crime, it is not included.
Career criminals are a small percentage of the population, but have a tremendous impact on public safety. Snyder (November 2001) estimates that eight to 10 percent of adolescents commit up to 70 percent of all serious and violent adolescent crime. These high-risk children have multiple risk factors and are often part of the cycle of intergenerational crime.
Public safety is important to policymakers. When crime decreases through apprehension of an offender or by preventing the criminal act, the public feels safer and more secure. Punishing or rehabilitating a criminal is mandatory, but crime prevention services are usually discretionary. Preventing crime, however, will avoid human pain and suffering, and can cost taxpayers less. If a crime prevention program is research based and has achieved measurable, positive results, public safety will be improved, but at what cost to taxpayers?
The taxpayer costs avoided tool resulting from this study can help policymakers answer the question: Is the cost to taxpayers for providing an ounce of crime prevention and avoiding economic and physical pain and suffering, worth the cost to taxpayers for the pound of criminal justice system cure? In some cases, the answer will be yes, and in others, it will be no. Policymakers will have the taxpayer costs avoided tool to assist them in making an informed decision.
|Advisor:||Major, Kristen Norman|
|School Location:||United States -- Minnesota|
|Source:||DAI-A 68/10, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Public administration, Criminology, Public policy|
|Keywords:||All Children Excel-ACE, An ounce of prevention, Cost of crime, Crime cost by government, Crime prevention, Juvenile crime, Juvenile crime prevention, Taxpayer costs, Taxpayer costs avoided|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be