Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

Comparative analysis of Public Health Laboratory Directors and State Health Officials attitudes on accreditation
by McHugh, William M., D.M., University of Phoenix, 2007, 156; 3300096
Abstract (Summary)

The quantitative quasi-experimental research study assessed the attitudes differences between 35 State Public Health Laboratory Directors and 27 State Health Officials on accreditation. Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior contends understanding the attitude of an individual or group will predict future behavior. The study findings discovered an attitude difference existed between the two respondent groups. In addition, the findings discovered the two respondent groups' displayed attitude differences on accreditation issues, including achieving accreditation through voluntary participation, which involves peer-review. Assessing the attitudes of two important groups of public health leaders in the initial implementation stages of a national accreditation program provides information on areas of concern and agreement for all public health leaders.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor:
Commitee:
School: University of Phoenix
School Location: United States -- Arizona
Source: DAI-A 69/01, Dissertation Abstracts International
Source Type: DISSERTATION
Subjects: Management, Public health, Public administration, Health care management
Keywords: Accreditation, Comparative study, Laboratory directors, Performance measures, Public health laboratories, State health officials
Publication Number: 3300096
ISBN: 978-0-549-44617-0
Copyright © 2019 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy
ProQuest