Organizations are faced with extraordinary diversity, ambiguity, turbulence, information overload, and, in sum, continuous complex change. A distinction in the organizational change and development literature has been made between episodic and continuous change. Episodic organizational change is conceptualized from a macro-level view as periods of equilibrium where organizations, seen as systems, maintain the status quo until a discontinuous change occurs that is created by intention and requires outside intervention (Weick & Quinn, 1999). Continuous organizational change is conceptualized from a micro-level view where change is evolving and continuous. Change is always emerging and requires neither intention nor outside intervention (Weick & Quinn). In this second case, change is conceptualized as endless patterns of emerging social practice and modifications of work processes (Stacey, 2001, 2003, 2007; Stacey, Griffin, & Shaw, 2000). These two perspectives provide different ways to understand change and present different implications for fostering and leading organizational change. This study examined the differences that each perspective presented in describing and understanding the processes of change/transformation in a single organization. It was found that continuous organizational change has greater explanatory power to help in understanding the Joint Warfighing Center (JWFC) 2005-2006 reorganization experience. The continuous change model explains how organizational change happens from a micro-perspective, continuously through interactions. The structure and direction offered by the episodic change model provides a predictable pattern to reach a pre-defined (known) goal thus can provide a blueprint of the macro patterns to be reinforced while insights from the continuous change model can guide moment to moment action. However, when something transformative (new) is the goal and it is not known in advance, the continuous change model is all one has. The structure and direction offered by the episodic model is, in this situation, not applicable. The continuous perspective offers an important new way to think about organizational change and leadership.
|School Location:||United States -- Virginia|
|Source:||DAI-A 68/12, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Management, Organizational behavior, Organization theory, Armed forces|
|Keywords:||Continuous change, Episodic change, Leadership, Organizational behavior, Organizational change, Organizational development, Organizational transformation, Transformation|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be