One of the methods to achieve organization change and improvement has been organizational learning, and there has been much written about this subject. The benefits of organizational learning theory have not been sufficiently quantified in the extant literature. Therefore, the topic to which this study was directed is the relationship between organizational learning and organizational change.
There is much literature in support of the benefits of organizational learning. Senge (1990a), Argyris and Schön (1974), Marsick and Watkins (1999), Knowles et al. (1998) and many others have laid out theoretical frameworks in the literature. Authors such a Jashapara (2003), Cameron & Whetten (1983), B.T. Phillips (2003) and others have noted the lack of quantifiable data in the literature in support of this theory.
This study evaluated; (a) The relationship between organizational learning and organizational change success, (b) the relationship between organizational learning and adult learning, (c) the relationship between adult learning and organizational change success, and (d) the relationship between the combination of adult learning and organizational learning and organizational change success.
A quantitative study was carried out using a 66 question survey instrument. A nonrandom convenience sample of professionals from organizations measured respondents, perceptions of their organizations on organizational learning, adult learning and organizational change effectiveness.
The results of this dissertation were that all hypotheses were supported with significant positive correlations between all related constructs, which were adult learning, organizational learning, and organizational change success. All anticipated hypotheses were supported.
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-A 68/10, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Adult education, Educational psychology, Business education|
|Keywords:||Adult learning, Change, Double loop, Organizational change, Organizational learning, Single loop|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be