This study investigated the interactions between the two personality factors derived from the Big Five model of personality known as "Openness to Experience" and "Agreeableness", with gay male intimate partner preference for theoretical romantic partners from each of the four major racial groups represented in the United States of America; Asian, Black, Latino, and White. Participants completed items from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP), and were then presented one randomly chosen vignette in which the potential intimate partner was described in exactly the same terms as the other possible vignettes, with the exception of one word within the paragraph overtly stating their race. They then responded to their impressions of this person by answering items presented on a semantic differential, providing data on how favorably or unfavorably they considered their potential intimate romantic partner. Contrary to expectations, Agreeableness was not found to be associated with racial preference in gay male partner selection, and Openness to Experience was only shown to have a significant F-test, though the Ryan test did not show any significant difference between any specific pair. This result contradicts the hypothesis that Agreeableness would be generalizable to partner preference and selection within the context of this study, and it suggests the need for further study on the relationship between Openness to Experience and willingness to consider an interracial coupling.
|School:||Arizona State University|
|School Location:||United States -- Arizona|
|Source:||DAI-B 69/07, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Social psychology, Personality psychology, Gender studies|
|Keywords:||Agreeableness, Gay, Gay male, Intimate partner, LGBT, Openness to experience, Partner preference, Race|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be