Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

Ideas, interests, and state policy: Biotechnology policy-making in the U.S. and the EU
by Yorgey, Joyia D. Chadwick, M.A., American University, 2008, 101; 1459278
Abstract (Summary)

The United States and the European Union have taken radically different approaches to the regulation of biotechnology and genetically modified organisms (GMOs). This difference in regulatory policy indicates important differences in the ideas that policymakers in the two states hold about appropriate regulation of cutting-edge science, which have been embodied in each state's regulatory framework. Thus, the research question: why was each particular set of ideas able to influence state policy in the U.S. and the EU? I argue that the structure of each state's political institutions privileges different policy-making actors, whose particular ideas then have greater influence over the policy-making process. This paper specifically examines the ideas promoted by state bureaucrats, public-interest groups, and scientific experts.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor: Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus
Commitee:
School: American University
School Location: United States -- District of Columbia
Source: MAI 47/02M, Masters Abstracts International
Source Type: DISSERTATION
Subjects: Political science, International law, Environmental science
Keywords: European Union, United States
Publication Number: 1459278
ISBN: 9780549839316
Copyright © 2018 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy
ProQuest