This study explored pre-service instructors' use of PowerPoint based on pre-service students' perceptions, and it identified pre-service students' perceptions of the efficacy of specific elements of PowerPoint design and delivery. The effectiveness of various elements of PowerPoint design and delivery was based on an extensive literature review and was framed on the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia (Mayer, 2000). The findings of the study identified pre-service instructors' practices and pre-service students' perceptions of the effectiveness of specific elements of design and delivery and were then compared with what research and expert literature purported were effective.
This one year study was conducted from the Spring of 2006 to the Spring of 2007. The mixed methods sequential explanatory design was followed. Qualitative data helped to explain and build on quantitative findings (Creswell, Plano Clark, Gutmann, & Hanson, 2003). Students were administered a Web based survey that included Likert scale items, as well as open ended responses. Analysis of the phase one results was used to inform the development of the phase two interview protocol as well as to identify students for participation in phase two. Data were collected via the phase two interview and analysis of the students' responses allowed for further explanation and a deeper understanding of the findings from phase one.
The intents of this study were to identify instructors' practices in the design and delivery of PowerPoint, and to reveal students' perceptions of the efficacy of their instructors' use of PowerPoint, as well as their perceptions of the effectiveness of specific elements of PowerPoint design and delivery. Furthermore, these findings were compared with existing research and expert literature that defined effective or ineffective ways to design and delivery PowerPoints.
|Advisor:||Patterson, Jerry L.|
|Commitee:||Ivankova, Nataliya, Parks, Shannon, Rice, Margaret, Rogan, Boyd|
|School:||The University of Alabama at Birmingham|
|School Location:||United States -- Alabama|
|Source:||DAI-A 69/11, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||School administration, Teacher education, Educational technology|
|Keywords:||College of Education, Multimedia, PowerPoint, Preservice, Technology|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be