Because community-based interventions to increase breast and cervical cancer screening have had limited success, concepts that move away from individual-level screening predictors and toward ecological-level predictors may be useful. Social capital encompasses both interpersonal and collective relations with others, and may be appropriate in the investigation of current cancer screening disparities.
This study used data from the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) for psychometric analysis and prediction of cancer screening behavior. Psychometric analysis included an expert Delphi panel, as well as validity and reliability analysis. Logistic regression tested the ability of social capital to predict breast and cervical cancer screening behavior against other known screening predictors. This study validated a six-item social capital scale (alpha=0.75) among 20,667 adult women. Multivariate modeling showed that social capital was a significant predictor of breast (OR=1.08, 95%CI=1.03-1.13) and cervical (OR=1.05, 95%CI=1.01-1.10) cancer screening behavior. However, commonly known predictors of cancer screening, such as insurance status and age, were stronger predictors of screening adherence than social capital. This study is the first step in exploring the link between social capital and cancer screening behavior, and may be a promising area of research in cancer prevention and control.
|Commitee:||Abroms, Lorien, Sarfaty, Mona, Simmens, Sam|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Public Health and Health Services|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-B 69/02, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Breast cancer, Cancer screening, Cervical cancer, Social capital, Social support, Women's health|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be