Unwritten codes may be problematic for a number of reasons. Unwritten codes may be negative and cause discord for educators. Pressure from peers regarding negative unwritten codes may influence teachers to make poor moral choices. Teachers may face personal turmoil when choosing their allegiance to either the unwritten code, their own personal code, or the professional code. Teachers may make decisions which do not necessarily model good moral choices for their students or fellow teachers.
The purpose of this study was to examine unwritten codes and the extent to which these codes may impact teachers. I explored what the unwritten codes are, the conflict between unwritten codes and professional codes or teachers' personal codes, and how these unwritten codes may or may affect teachers' decisions. I utilized a mixed methods study including surveys and interviews with nine Maine K–12 teachers.
Comparative methods were utilized to surface patterns and emerging themes. There is powerful evidence that unwritten codes affect the daily lives of teachers. An analysis revealed five themes. First, unwritten codes are pervasive in schools. Teachers expressed that they learned more by talk in the teachers' room than through any formal mechanism or policy book. Second, the codes were overwhelmingly negative—“Don't do extra work without additional pay,” “Don't trust administrators,” and most importantly, “Never undercut a fellow teacher.” Third, the unwritten code has a very powerful influence. This influence has an impact on nearly all teachers, but especially young teachers. Fourth, when teachers break the unwritten code it usually is because a child's welfare is at stake and there is a clash with their personal code. Fifth, most of the participants distanced themselves from listening to, or disseminating the unwritten codes. They pointed to other teachers and even administrators as the ones who perpetuate the unwritten codes in the building.
Unwritten codes add a whole new level of complexity to the dilemmas teachers face. The findings and conclusions of this study suggest implications for teacher preparation programs, administrative preparation programs, school districts, teacher associations, and for aspiring teachers, themselves.
|School:||The University of Maine|
|School Location:||United States -- Maine|
|Source:||DAI-A 70/02, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Code of silence, Ethics, Personal codes, Professional codes, School culture, Unwritten codes|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be