This project examines a group of college students' understandings of career as they prepare to graduate. Based on a grounded theory analysis of 10 focus groups and 21 interviews, this project explores the way 56 college seniors make sense of societal and familial career discourses. The students articulate dominant discourses of appropriate post-college choices. These include that the student should have a plan that meets the following standards: requires one's degree, ensures financial security, is prestigious, is career-focused, and is something at which one can excel. I analyze students' responses to these dominant discourses. While students accept the discourses by making discourse-aligned choices and judging those who do not comply, their acceptance is not total. Students also resist the dominant discourses. They do so by making alternative choices and calling upon resistance discourses. Students also simultaneously accept and resist the dominant discourses. Based on these findings, I argue that the dominant discourses experienced by the students operate as a form of control privileging certain career choices, approaches to career, and career decision-making criteria while marginalizing others. However, this control is not total. Instead, it exists in a dialectical relationship with resistance.
|Advisor:||Mumby, Dennis K.|
|Commitee:||Akos, Patrick T., Blair, Carole, May, Steven K., Rosenfeld, Lawrence B.|
|School:||The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill|
|School Location:||United States -- North Carolina|
|Source:||DAI-A 69/07, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Communication, Organizational behavior, Organization theory|
|Keywords:||Career decision-making, Career discourse, College students, Critical theory, Organizational communication, Power/resistance dialectics, Socialization, Vocational anticipatory socialization|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be