The research objectives were to examine trends over time in patient out-of-pocket spending and insurance coverage of outpatient mental health and substance abuse visits, and to also assess other factors that may affect patient expenditures as a percentage of total visit spending. Data from 1996-2004 were extracted from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a publicly available, nationally representative household survey for the U.S. civilian non-institutionalized population. The unit of observation was the office-based visit; there were 521,888 events for 65,749 privately insured individuals (476,545 non-MH/SA visits and 45,343 MH/SA visits). The two outcome variables of interest were: (1) proportion visit expenditures paid by the patient out-of-pocket; and (2) a binary outcome of whether the patient paid 100% of the visit expenditures. Fractional logistic regression, a technique applied when the dependent variable is a proportion, was performed in a generalized linear model to examine the first outcome. Logistic regression was used to analyze models with the second outcome. Results. Over 1996-2004, the percent of MH/SA expenses paid by the patient out-of-pocket (%OOP) declined significantly, as was the case with other types of health care visits. An analysis of the binary outcome of 100% OOP (where the patient paid all of the expenses) vs. < 100% OOP, had similar results: over 1996-2004, there was a significant decrease in the likelihood that MH/SA patients would pay 100% of the visit expense; nevertheless, significantly more MH/SA visits than non-MH/SA encounters continue to be paid in full by the patient. Hence, there remains a consistent gap between the lower percentage of visit costs paid for non-MH/SA and the higher proportion paid for mental health and substance abuse visits. The results concerning payment-in-full for MH/SA visits suggest that insurance may be less of a factor in payment for MH/SA services than with non-MH/SA care. Overall, these analyses indicate that insurance coverage in general is improving, while a variety of factors may contribute to a continuing lag in the extent of insurance payment for MH/SA services. Despite improvements in coverage of MH/SA care, there is not genuine parity in private insurance payment for MH/SA and non-MH/SA care.
|Commitee:||Roberts, Robert E., Rosenau, Pauline V.|
|School:||The University of Texas School of Public Health|
|Department:||Policy & Community Health|
|School Location:||United States -- Texas|
|Source:||DAI-B 69/03, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Mental health, Public health, Health care|
|Keywords:||Health insurance, Health insurance coverage, Health insurance parity, MEPS, Mental health, Out-of-pocket payments, Substance abuse services|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be