On immigration reform, the motivated minority that highly influences public policy is in dissonance with the policy preferences of the majority of Americans. In 2006, an attempt at comprehensive immigration reform whose main tenets were supported by 80 percent of Americans in a Gallup poll was defeated when anti-immigration opponents flooded the Senate switchboard with protest calls. This study, using primary data from a national telephone survey, finds that the majority of Americans views are not represented by interest groups involved in the policy debate on immigration. Americans are moderate in their viewpoint being both against the flow of unauthorized immigration while at the same time acknowledging that hard-working immigrants should be allowed to become citizens. However, for those who support stricter immigration measures, the issue is of higher salience, which provides them with more influence than the general public.
|Advisor:||Mayer, Jeremy D.|
|School:||George Mason University|
|School Location:||United States -- Virginia|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/05, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Law, Political science, Public policy|
|Keywords:||Immigration, Interest groups, Pluralism, Public opinion|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be