Using an understanding of rhetoric as techniques of deliberation, this project identifies rhetorical strategies for overcoming the ongoing resistance to desegregation of the compulsory school system by re-imagining the role of diversity in education and schools' role in political deliberation. The 2007 Supreme Court ruling that outlaws the use of quotas as a means of maintaining racial balance in our schools signals the need to look beyond the courts for ways to make desegregation a compelling and viable project. In addition to legal defeats, common arguments in favor of desegregation, such as calls for "equal opportunity" and "tolerance," no longer seem to inspire families and educators to makes changes in the schools. Believing that a renewed investment in desegregation must come from somewhere other than legal discourses and liberalist ideals, I have looked primarily at psychology texts for possible arguments in favor of cultivating diverse student populations.
My chief objective is to identify arguments that defend the technocracy of schooling, which is to say its engineered, contrived, imposing, and institutional aspects. Drawing upon an understanding of technical knowledge as inventive cultural habit, I argue on behalf of making technical knowledge the focus of compulsory schooling. For technical knowledge to serve pluralistic education, however, schools must defy standardization, recognize the political value of imposition, and look to diversity as a resource. To that end, I identify rhetorics that defend the impositions of desegregation as necessary for challenging ethnocentricity, and that advocate for diversity as a means of preventing technical homogeneity. Such arguments enable a re-framing of compulsory schooling as an obligatory institutional exercise in socialization for a diverse society.
|Advisor:||Terrill, Robert E.|
|Commitee:||Goodman, Jesse, Lucaites, John L., Pezzullo, Phaedra C.|
|Department:||Communication and Culture|
|School Location:||United States -- Indiana|
|Source:||DAI-A 69/11, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Education history, Rhetoric|
|Keywords:||Compulsory schooling, Pluralism, Political judgment, Rhetoric, Techne|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be