This study was designed to better understand the dynamics of gender in conflict management situations. Although much research has focused on the effects of an individual's gender on conflict management style, few studies have considered the other's gender as a variable. The stakes of a conflict have rarely been studied, and were also included in this analysis. Four different gender communication theories were considered to interpret the results: male dominance theory, different cultures theory, skills specialization theory, and minimal differences theory. Although some sex differences were found, especially in regards to the other's gender, minimal differences theory was the most supported. The stakes of a conflict were the most predictive of an individual's conflict management style usage.
|School:||State University of New York at Buffalo|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||MAI 47/04M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Womens studies, Communication, Gender studies|
|Keywords:||Conflict management, Gender, Interpersonal conflict, Sex, Stakes|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be