COMING SOON! PQDT Open is getting a new home!

ProQuest Open Access Dissertations & Theses will remain freely available as part of a new and enhanced search experience at

Questions? Please refer to this FAQ.

Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

"Thy Fearful [A]symmetry": Exploring the Differences Between Moral and Nonmoral Testimony
by Hernandez, Miguel, M.A., California State University, Long Beach, 2021, 52; 28265051
Abstract (Summary)

It is difficult to deny that we all have a dependence on testimony for coming to know large swaths of basic knowledge. Statements regarding what food we ought to eat, what the weather will be like a few days from now, or who the twelfth president of the United States was are examples of information that we acquire through testimony. Most of us likely do not have qualms with acquiring knowledge in this way. However, we might wonder whether the situation is the same for testimony with moral substance. In this thesis, I argue that moral and nonmoral testimony are not as different as has previously been supposed. I will argue that moral testimony can be justifiably adopted for the same reasons that nonmoral testimony can be justifiably adopted–those reasons being that it is possible to evaluate the sources of moral testimony through indirect means which touch on their reliability.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor: Laskowski, Nicholas
Commitee: Wallis, Charles, Nolan, Lawrence
School: California State University, Long Beach
Department: Philosophy
School Location: United States -- California
Source: MAI 82/10(E), Masters Abstracts International
Subjects: Ethics, Philosophy, Epistemology
Keywords: Meta-ethics, Social epistemology, Moral tesimony, Nonmoral testimony
Publication Number: 28265051
ISBN: 9798597084732
Copyright © 2021 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy