This study aims to present a synoptic content analysis of school disciplinary policies and administrative practices. This study is grounded in the theoretical perspective of Michel Foucault and his work on power and social institutions focusing on how power is interwoven into social institutions and works through and on those within it. The unit of analysis for this study is the school discipline policy itself and those who interpret and act on it, the school administrators. Regions II/IV of Virginia provides the discipline policies and the participants for this study.
The synoptic content analysis uncovers language that demonstrates the presence of technologies or mechanisms of power, which are deeply rooted in school disciplinary policies and administrative discourse and maintain and perpetuate harsher disproportionate disciplinary practices for students with disabilities; normalizing judgment, surveillance, and hierarchical observation, and the examination. The synoptic content analysis also uncovers language that appears to be acting in resistance to current disciplinary policies and practices.
This study adds to the growing body of existing literature surrounding school discipline policy and practice and promotes an awareness of the subjectification and marginalization that disproportionate use of harsher punitive measures has on students with disabilities. The study is also a call to policy reform that argues for “wording” changes to the policy and a shift in how educational leaders and society view behavior and define “the good student.” This study forces educational leaders, more specifically building administrators, to authentically reflect on implicit biases that may exist concerning behavior, rules, expectations, and behavioral problems exhibited by students with disabilities.
|Advisor:||Nganga, Christine W.|
|Commitee:||Burns, James P., Gresham, Dora|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Educational Administration & Policy Studies|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/9(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Education, Social research, Educational administration, Education Policy|
|Keywords:||School discipline, Disciplinary policies, Synoptic content analysis, Administrative discourse, Michael Foucault, Power|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be