COMING SOON! PQDT Open is getting a new home!

ProQuest Open Access Dissertations & Theses will remain freely available as part of a new and enhanced search experience at www.proquest.com.

Questions? Please refer to this FAQ.

Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

Accuracy of Fit of Direct Printed Aligners Versus Thermoformed Aligners
by Koenig, Nickolas L., M.S.D.R., Saint Louis University, 2020, 60; 28256575
Abstract (Summary)

Objective: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the fit between thermoformed and direct-printed aligners. Materials and Method: Three types of aligners(N=36) were manufactured from the same reference STL file: thermoformed aligners were manufactured using (n=12) Zendura Flx™ (BayMaterials, Fremont, CA), and (n=12) Essix ACE™ (Dentsply Sirona, Sarasota, FL) and Direct-Printed aligners were printed with Tera Harz™ TC-85DAP 3-D Printer UV Resin . The samples (N=36) were sprayed with an opaque scanning spray, scanned, imported to Geomagic® Control X™ metrology software, and superimposed on the reference STL file using the “Best Fit Alignment” algorithm. Distances between the aligner meshes and the reference STL file were measured at 9 anatomical landmarks. The average measurements and standard deviations between aligners and reference models at each anatomical landmark were examined to compare the accuracy of fit between t he three types of aligners. Results: Mean absolute discrepancies in the Zendura Flx™ aligners ranged from 0. 076 ± 0.057 mm to 0.260 ± 0.35 mm and in the Essix ACE™ aligners ranged between 0.188 ± 0.27 mm to 0.457 ± 0.35mm, while in the direct printed aligners they ranged from 0.079 ±0.054 mm to 0.224 ± 0.021 mm. Root mean square (RMS) values, representing overall trueness, ranged from 0.209mm ± 0.094mm (Essix ACE) to 0.140 ± 0.020mm (Direct-Printed). Permutation tests identified significant differences between thermoformed aligners and direct-printed aligners at 6 out of the 9 bilateral landmarks and overall (RMS) Conclusions: This study showed greater trueness and precision of direct-printed aligners than thermoformed aligners.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor: Kim, Ki B.
Commitee: McCray, Julie F., Hayes, Andrew M.
School: Saint Louis University
Department: Orthodontics
School Location: United States -- Missouri
Source: MAI 82/9(E), Masters Abstracts International
Source Type: DISSERTATION
Subjects: Dentistry, Materials science
Keywords: Accuracy of fit, Clear aligners, Direct-printed aligners, Thermoforming
Publication Number: 28256575
ISBN: 9798597065663
Copyright © 2021 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy
ProQuest