This study explored the relationship between interpersonal trust and cooperation between dyads in a strategic alliance consisting of three professional consulting firms. By focusing on the dyad as the unit of analysis, this study employed a non-experimental, one-shot design to explore correlations among the relationships between interpersonal trust, affect- and cognition-based trust, cooperation, time (length of time working together and frequency of interaction). A web-based survey was administered that incorporated McAllister’s (1995) Behavioral Response and Interpersonal Trust Measures (BRITM). The researcher modified the BRITM by adding additional items to the instrument to measure the effect of time on the interpersonal and cooperation relationship between the dyads. The alliance in this study was formed four years ago and the length of the dyadic relationships varied, as well as the frequency of their number of interactions. A census sample represented the sample population, and responses from eighty-nine subjects were used for the data analysis. Pearson coefficient correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationships between interpersonal trust and cooperation, cognition-based trust and cooperation, and affect-based trust and cooperation. A stepwise linear regression analysis was used to determine if the dyad’s length of time working together and monthly interactions affected their interpersonal trust and cooperation relationship. An additional analysis using on the using an independent sample t-test and an ANOVA with Tukey and Games-Howell post hoc tests was used to measure the time variables. The most significant finding for this study revealed no difference between the interpersonal trust and cooperation relationship for dyads that worked together for 2 to 4 years when compared to dyads that worked together less than 2 years. However, there was a difference between the interpersonal trust and cooperation relationship for the dyads based on the frequency of their monthly interactions. The relationship between interpersonal trust, affect- and cognition-based trust and cooperation among the dyads was found to be significant. This study provides empirical and theoretical support for interpersonal trust and cooperation in dyadic relationships and strategic alliances.
|Advisor:||Casey, Andrea J.|
|Commitee:||Schwandt, David R., Szabla, David B.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Human and Organizational Learning|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/04, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Organization Theory, Business education|
|Keywords:||Boundary spanners, Cooperation, Dyads, Interpersonal trust, Partnerships, Strategic alliances|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be