While many studies have focused on the role and impact of American pop culture as a strategic soft power resource for the United States, the institutional role of U.S. embassies is often neglected. Yet embassies have become an increasingly active component of American public diplomacy, especially in the digital era. In recent years, online networks such as Twitter have become indispensable tools employed by U.S. embassies to advance their mission of promoting American interests internationally and communicating with foreign nationals and local citizens. This paper examines how the U.S. Embassy in France uses Twitter as a public diplomacy soft power tool. Empirically, the comparative analysis is threefold. First, the paper compares and contrasts traditional, non-digital initiatives deployed by the U.S. Embassy in France with the embassy’s current digital initiatives. Second, the paper conducts a cross-sectional comparison of the U.S. Embassy’s Twitter account with Twitter efforts at the U.S. Embassy in Russia, Germany, and Afghanistan. And third, the paper compares the Twitter efforts by the U.S. Embassy in France with Twitter accounts managed by the Russian, German, and Afghan embassies in Washington, D.C. These comparisons help assess the efficacy of Twiplomacy as a soft power tool and whether it complements traditional public diplomacy or is used strategically with its own goals. At a time when digital tools have become indispensable for election campaigns in politics and brand marketing in the private sector, in state diplomacy, the use of these tools remains relatively underdeveloped. It is argued that embassy-led Twiplomacy tends to either complement traditional public diplomacy efforts or amplify foreign policy objectives. This can possibly be explained by the lack of measurable goals and outcomes in public diplomacy, in contrast to more precise measures in election and brand marketing campaigns where votes and sales demonstrate effectiveness.
|Commitee:||Feldman, Jessica, Westley, Hannah|
|School:||The American University of Paris (France)|
|Source:||MAI 82/8(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Political science, Multimedia Communications, International Relations|
|Keywords:||Covert cultural diplomacy, Digital diplomacy, Hard power, Propaganda, Soft power, Twitter, Embassies, Foreign policy|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be