Although there were almost 3.5 million reported information breaches of health care data in the first quarter of 2019, health care providers do not know the extent of digital and nondigital breaches of patient medical records. The purpose of this quantitative, comparative study was to identify the difference between the individual patient records affected by digital versus nondigital breaches for three types of health care entities in the United States, health care providers, health care plans, and health care clearinghouses. Allman’s privacy regulation theory, the National Institute of Standards and Technology Privacy Framework, and ecological systems theory comprised the theoretical framework. The focus of the research questions was on the difference between digital and nondigital breaches for each of the health care entities. The study data consisted of 2,601 digital and nondigital breach reports for the three healthcare entities for the years 2010 to 2018 retrieved from the public database of HIPAA breach and violations maintained by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Significant t tests of the hypotheses for each health care entity indicated that more breaches occurred digitally than nondigitally, and that health plan provider breaches resulted in a greater number of individuals impacted per incident than breaches of healthcare providers or healthcare clearinghouses. The implication for positive social change is that the study findings may help health care entities make better decisions about how to allocate scarce information security resources to lower health care costs by reducing the breaches of health care records.
|School Location:||United States -- Minnesota|
|Source:||DAI-B 82/8(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Health care management, Computer science, Information Technology|
|Keywords:||Digital breach, Healthcare clearinghouses, Healthcare cost, Healthcare provider, healthplan provider, HIPAA|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be