This study seeks to investigate curricular trends in MOOCs and institutional participation in the development of MOOC courses. The study is framed utilizing the theoretical lenses of academic capitalism and isomorphism—particularly Riesman’s conceptualization of a “snake-like procession” of isomorphism in American higher education lead by “elite” colleges and universities. Using those lenses, the following hypotheses were created that informed the research methodology: 1) course offerings in MOOCs are becoming increasingly professionalized, so, over time, more career-skill oriented courses will be expected to be offered and 2) as time progresses, elite higher education institutions (HEIs) will decrease their participation MOOCs while non-elite HEIs will increase their participation in MOOC course development. Descriptive data, crosstabulations, and chi-square analysis provide a starting point of analysis while a series of multilevel logistic regressions provides a more robust understanding of curricular trends.
The results of the study indicate that, overall, MOOC course offerings are increasingly professionalized. The findings indicated that all HEIs, as well as public, private, and non-elite HEIs were increasingly more likely to offered career-skill oriented courses as time progressed; elite HEIs and non-HEIs (i.e. corporations, nonprofit orgs, etc.) were not more likely to offer professionalized courses. Mixed evidence of isomorphism was found. Some evidence indicated that elite HEIs were decreasing their participation in MOOCs while non-elite HEIs were increasing theirs, adhering to Riesman’s theory; however, when looking at the professionalization of curriculum, it was evident that non-elite HEIs were leading the way, in contrast to Riesman’s theory. However, overall, HEIs—with the exception of elite HEIs—were increasing professionalization of MOOC course offerings.
|Advisor:||Lee, Jenny J.|
|Commitee:||Rhoades, Gary D., Salazar, Karina G.|
|School:||The University of Arizona|
|School Location:||United States -- Arizona|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/8(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Higher education, Educational administration, Information science, Education Policy, Curriculum development, Political science|
|Keywords:||Academic capitalism, Isomorphism, MOOCs, Curriculum trends, Institutional participation|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be