The vast majority of students who enroll in a two-year college intend to earn a bachelor’s degree. However, only about 14% transfer and earn a bachelor’s degree within six years (Jenkins & Fink, 2016). The need to increase the number of bachelor’s degree holders (Torpey, 2018), and the increasing number of students beginning at two-year institutions demands the creation of smoother transfer pathways (Handel, 2013). Vertical transfer students comprise a majority of transfer-related studies, however, little research has focused on the efficiency and efficacy of that process (Gard, Paton, & Gosselin, 2012). Institutions can strengthen transfer student resources with a better understanding of students’ transfer experiences.
This study sought to understand and analyze the creation and improvement of a vertical transfer program through the lens of Deming’s Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle (The W. Edwards Deming Institute, 2017). A descriptive case study methodology examined one vertical transfer program between a two-year and a four-year institution. Participant interviews, observations, and documents were gathered and analyzed to holistically examine the vertical transfer program’s complexities in its natural context.
The six recurring themes emerging from the data uncovered the program’s strengths, but also the challenges the program has faced. Though many of the challenges provided an opportunity for program growth and improvement, participants outlined remaining challenges. Recommendations for future practice are developing a transfer culture, developing institutional partnerships, training employees and incentivizing transfer. By implementing these recommendations, institutions can positively impact student transfer.
Given the lack of extant research on how institutions create and improve vertical transfer programming, this case study unveiled how one program lived out its creation and improvement process. Future researchers can use the current study to further expand the student transfer knowledge base by evaluating transfer goal effects, exploring faculty influence on transfer, examining developmental education’s transfer impact, including student perspectives, as well as conducting qualitative research.
|Commitee:||Worley, Deborah, Carmichael, Jeffrey, Cohen, Joshua|
|School:||The University of North Dakota|
|School Location:||United States -- North Dakota|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/7(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Higher education, Educational administration|
|Keywords:||Community College, Persistence, Student Success, Transfer, Transition|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be