This qualitative virtual ethnographic study was conducted to explore the discourse around the science of reading topic through the lens of a social media Twitter hashtag known as #scienceofreading. Participants for this study consisted of any person that had an account on Twitter and entered into the discourse of the topic of the science of reading using the #scienceofreading contained within their tweet or attached to their tweet. Participants were observed in the public social media platform of Twitter. Three research questions were used to explain the phenomenon: 1) What are the roles of the participants involved in the discourse around the science of reading on Twitter? 2) What stimuli creates discourse around the science of reading on Twitter? 3) What are the discourse patterns or themes around educational issues, educational research, or educational information about the science of reading through the lens of the social media Twitter #scienceofreading? Qualitative data analysis revealed information about identified participants roles, stimuli, and discourse themes around #scienceofreading on Twitter. First, top identified participants that engaged in discourse around #scienceofreading were educators, professionals associated with an educational business, and advocates. Secondly, top identified stimuli that created discourse around #scienceofreading on Twitter were opinion and promotional stimuli. Lastly, top discourse themes and patterns around #scienceofreading on Twitter were tweets that were intended to provoke discourse, promote “when we know better, we do better”, promote disparagement, and marketing discourse tweets.
|Commitee:||Nolen, Amanda, Endel, Karen|
|School:||University of Arkansas at Little Rock|
|School Location:||United States -- Arkansas|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/6(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Reading instruction, Web Studies, Educational leadership, Science education, Educational sociology|
|Keywords:||Evidence-based reading, Hashtag, Science of reading, Social media, Twitter|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be