Universal screeners are mandated in many states, but the impact of the use of screeners and pragmatic instructional programs are not well connected. The purpose of this mixed methods study addressed a significant need for understanding how to connect screening instruments to instructional designs that support a preventative approach to literacy instruction. Additionally, this study aimed to uncover teachers’ perceptions about the affordances and challenges of screeners to create a multitiered system of supports for reading instruction in an inclusive kindergarten setting. Encompassing a pragmatic research paradigm this study was framed by cognitive behavioral theory revealing a multiple cognitive deficit model of dyslexia. This study utilized a mixed methods explanatory sequential design. The participants included one class of kindergarten students and one kindergarten teacher in a west coast suburban parochial school. Data collection included scores on the PALS literacy screener and KTEA-3 dyslexia screener and a semi-structured teacher interview. A Pearson r correlation coefficient was used to analyze the quantitative data. A significant correlation was noted between constructs within and between the PALS and KTEA-3 screeners. Letter naming facility, letter sound understanding and concept of word all presented as important constructs. A generic coding method was used to analyze the qualitative data and then the quantitative and qualitative data were integrated. Results from this research offer the potential to guide future research in practical models for inclusive literacy instruction aligned to multi-tiered system of supports within the kindergarten classroom setting.
|Commitee:||Cook, Kyle, Stewart, Olivia|
|School:||St. John's University (New York)|
|Department:||SOE Department of Education Specialties|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/5(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Reading instruction, Early childhood education, Disability studies|
|Keywords:||Dyslexia, Kindergarten, Literacy, Reading, Screening|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be