This dissertation seeks to understand the full context within which sex-selective abortion (SSA) occurs in India. It examines the historical forces, political movements, government policies, and gender regimes that have shaped SSA. I use qualitative research methods within a feminist methodology, including in-depth interviews with service providers, scholars, and professionals and a content analysis of three national newspapers. My study interrogates three critical areas of analysis: First, I examine the social and institutional determinants that create the preconditions and conditions for SSA. Second, I explore the potential for women’s agency since SSA is generally understood as antithetical to gender justice and perceived as stemming from the devaluation of women and girls. Third, I use the unobtrusive method of content analysis to examine gendered portrayals of SSA and women in the Indian media. In centering the narratives of service providers and professionals with systems-wide knowledge of SSA, my work offers a context-specific and informed insider perspective. Further, by grounding my research in the interests and experience of research participants, I facilitate feminist research that encourages the mutual involvement of both the researcher and research participants in shaping the research. Based on my research findings, I make the following assertions in this dissertation. First, in India, there is a conflation between legal abortion and illegal sex-determination with the intent of sex-selection. The conflation of the two often restricts women’s reproductive rights, including the right to legal abortions. Second, the family is an authoritative site that establishes norms and rules about gender, sexuality, resource distribution, and, ultimately, SSA. Third, women exercise varying degrees of agency in their reproductive choices, and not all SSA decisions result from coercion. Lastly, the government perpetuates colonial paradigms by pronouncing paternalistic guardianship and protective framings on women’s bodies, sexuality, and reproductive capacities.
|Commitee:||Doan, Alesha, Donovan, Brian, Deer, Sarah, Wilson, Aimee|
|School:||University of Kansas|
|Department:||Women, Gender & Sexuality Studies|
|School Location:||United States -- Kansas|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/4(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Womens studies, Sociology, Journalism, Public policy, Gender studies, Public administration, Political science, Health care management, South Asian Studies|
|Keywords:||Abortion, Content analysis, Feminist methodology, Qualitative research, Reproductive rights, Sex-selective abortion, Gender justice, National newspaper influence, Indian media, Sex discrimination, Paternalistic gardianship, Women's bodies|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be