This dissertation is a systematic comparison of Mengzi’s and Hume’s ethical thought. It argues that Mengzi’s and Hume’s ethical views bear significant affinities with each other in the following aspects: both forms of ethics appeal to the affective sensitivity of human nature when understanding moral psychology, both anchor the standard of virtue in the sentiments generated by the evaluative activity of humans interacting with each other in relationships, and both contain the commitment that some virtues consist in voluntary submission to social norms which exist to facilitate the well-being of humans.
Previous comparisons of Mengzi and Hume contain misinterpretations of the two thinkers and require metaphysical commitments beyond what they claim in the texts. In this project, I aim at developing a comparative framework based on faithful interpretations of both thinkers. In the process I (1) shed light on Mengzi’s ethics as an attractive and defensible ethical theory by divorcing it from the dubious metaphysics informing previous interpretations, (2) advance discussion of the role played by institutional norms in a sentiment-based ethics, and (3) use Mengzian and Humean resources to reconstruct a plausible model of moral cultivation.
Emerging from this interpretative and comparative project is a sentiment-based virtue theory that deserves attention because it is plausible and avoids some of the problems of eudaimonistic virtue ethics. On a more general level, I wish to call for a reconsideration and critical appreciation of the legacy of the Enlightenment.
|Commitee:||Abramson, Kate, Ing, Michael, Nance, Richard|
|School Location:||United States -- Indiana|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/3(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Religion, Philosophy, Asian Studies, Comparative religion|
|Keywords:||comparative studies, Hume, Mengzi, virtue|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be