Approximately one in every ten public school students in the United States is considered an English learner (Sanchez, 2017). It has also been determined that the English learner population is one of the fastest-growing populations in the United States (Gibson, 2016). This study focused on a school district in the Midwest region of the United States, where approximately 4% of the student population was classified as English learners, and the population had been steadily growing since 2014 (School District Manual, 2019). This Midwestern school district offered a unique English learner program by transporting students to specific Instructional Sites for English learner instruction (J. Borland, personal communication, February 7, 2020). The purpose of this study was to determine if there were significant differences in academic achievement, attendance, and behavior between the two student groups who received either direct instruction or indirect instruction based on where the student elected to attend school. The population for this study consisted of all eligible English learner students for one school year. The literature reviewed for this study was analyzed to support the findings of this study and to understand English learner education and the impact on English learner students’ academic outcomes. From the data collected and analyzed, there were significant differences in the ACCESS and the MAP ELA assessment outcomes showing that students who received indirect instruction received higher scores than students who received direct instruction. There were no statistically significant differences between student groups on the MAP Math assessment, attendance rate, or discipline incidence rate.
|Commitee:||Carson, Craig, Franklin, Melia|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/3(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||English as a Second Language, Educational evaluation, Pedagogy|
|Keywords:||Academic Achievement, English learner Instruction, Direct instruction, Indirect instruction|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be