As the Housing First approach to homeless service provision has proliferated in the United States in recent years, varied understandings of the model have emerged and a wide range of outcomes have been reported. This study seeks to better understand the variation in the implementation of Housing First, to identify outcomes of interest to stakeholders to improve future evaluations of the model, and to compare Housing First in practice to Housing First in theory. In order to achieve these goals, this study utilizes an exploratory sequential mixed methods research design beginning with a qualitative case study of Housing First programs in the Greater Boston area of Massachusetts followed by the design and distribution of an original online survey to a national sample of organizations operating Housing First programs (n = 283) to collect data for quantitative analysis. Qualitative data suggest that the implementation of Housing First is largely determined by the history of the organization, whether the organization chose to transition to Housing First or was compelled to do so by a funder, and the level of staff enthusiasm for the model. Key outcome measures identified by stakeholders include percent of program participants exiting to homelessness, percent of program participants evicted or involuntarily terminated, life satisfaction among program participants, ability of program participants to perform activities of daily living, and program participant progress toward achieving goals beyond attaining and maintaining housing. Quantitative analysis of survey data reveals that in general, practitioners adhere closely to Housing First in theory as it is broadly defined by the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness. There is also widespread adoption of the narrowly defined Pathways Housing First model, with Housing First practitioners most commonly operating scattered-site permanent supportive housing programs that serve people experiencing chronic homelessness. Regression modeling shows that broadly, fidelity to Housing First in theory, level of staff enthusiasm for Housing First, whether the organization chose to utilize a Housing First approach or was compelled to do so by a funder, and the length of time that an organization has been utilizing a Housing First approach are all significantly correlated with key outcomes.
|Advisor:||Johnson, Michael P.|
|Commitee:||Crandall, Susan R., Schutt, Russell K.|
|School:||University of Massachusetts Boston|
|Department:||Public Policy (PhD)|
|School Location:||United States -- Massachusetts|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/3(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Homelessness, Housing first, Public policy|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be