The Internet is not a safe place. The problem was 55% (26) of 47 Top Level Domains (TLDs) in Central, South America, and the Caribbean have not adopted the Domain Name System Security Extension (DNSSEC) developed to protect their domains and, thus, protect 21 ccTLDs but leave 26 ccTLDs susceptible to malicious hacker attacks. The purpose of this qualitative exploratory case study was to understand Central American, South American, and Caribbean TLD IT decision-makers’ perceptions of adopters’ and non-adopters in terms of performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), and facilitating conditions (FC) factors and its influence on the adoption of DNSSEC. Thematic analysis of the data collected resulted in six themes that aligned with the four research questions. The six themes discussed are the following: (1) Implementing DNSSEC help improve ccTLD’s cybersecurity but cost and misconfigurations are a disadvantage, (2) Dedicated personnel with a high-level skillset in security is needed to implement DNSSEC, (3) Social influencers promote DNSSEC implementation in ccTLDs, (4) Lack of a Technical Infrastructure and Trained Personnel are Challenges that Impede DNSSEC Implementation in ccTLDs, (5) Implementing DNSSEC improves the ccTLD’s reputation, and (6) Overcoming financial, technical, promotional, and workload challenges help improve corporate clients’ adoption of DNSSEC. The results of the study emphasized the significance of the factors that impeded the implementation of DNSSEC to ensure a safe Internet ecosystem.
|Commitee:||Sessoms-Penny, Sandra, Young, Elizabeth|
|School:||University of Phoenix|
|Department:||School of Advanced Studies|
|School Location:||United States -- Arizona|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/3(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Organizational behavior, Information Technology, Social research|
|Keywords:||Complexity, Cybersecurity, DNS, DNSSEC, Domain names, Leadership|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be