Background: Self-selected (SSWS) and maximum walking speeds (MWS) are frequently studied and related to multiple body systems, function, falls, and mortality. Walking at a slow speed voluntarily or measuring a range of walking speeds (WS), however, has rarely been investigated. Purpose: The aims of this project were to explore a proposed measure of WS adaptability called total walking speed range (TWSR), to assess the reliability and validity of slow walking speed (slowWS) as a component of TWSR, to assess if TWSR could predict function, disability or community mobility, and finally, to compare the predictive ability of TWSR to single walking speeds. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, observational study using a convenience sample of independent community-dwelling older adults. Subjects were assessed in a single session with a battery of tests measuring common correlates of walking speed, several walking speeds, and outcome measures for function, disability (Late Life Function and Disability Instrument), and community mobility (Life-Space Assessment). Results: SlowWS demonstrated excellent test-retest and interrater reliability. SlowWS was only significantly correlated with TWSR, but TWSR was correlated with all study variables including the outcomes. TWSR significantly predicted function (adj. R2 = .364, p < .0005), life-space (adj. R2 = .185, p = .019), disability limitation (adj. R2 = .107, p < .0005) and disability frequency (adj. R2 = .041, p < .0005). In comparisons, SSWS predicted more variance in function, disability limitation and frequency than TWSR or MWS, but TWSR predicted life-space better. When covariates were included in models, neither TWSR, SSWS, nor MWS contributed independently to prediction of the outcomes. The hierarchical models for TWSR/SSWS/MWS performed similarly and final explained variances were within 1% of each other, except for the prediction of life-space. The model with covariates + TWSR predicted more life-space variance than covariates + SSWS (adj. R2 = .173, p < .0005 vs .145, p = .001). Conclusion: Walking at a slow speed can be reliably measured, consistent with findings for other WS. TWSR, but not slowWS, correlated with measures of body structure/function, activities, and participation and also predicted function, disability, and community mobility. However, the predictive ability of TWSR was not superior to SSWS or MWS. TWSR requires further research as a measure of walking speed adaptability, especially in relation to life-space.
|Commitee:||Gallichio, Joann, Chui, Kevin|
|School:||Nova Southeastern University|
|School Location:||United States -- Florida|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/1(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Physical therapy, Disability studies|
|Keywords:||Community-dwelling older adults, Disability, Life-space, Total walking speed reserve, Walking speed|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be