The focus of this study was to identify the preferred schedule type (block or traditional) for students and teachers in high schools. Additionally, the purpose of the study was to explore why high schools should assess how time is used during the school day. Survey responses about time management practices of students and teachers at one high school were reported, and implications for how to construct a schedule based on the survey responses were explored. Students and teachers with experience in block and traditional scheduling formats were surveyed for the study. Participants received an online survey and were asked to respond to statements regarding their attitudes and perceptions of block and traditional scheduling. Teachers felt that students were more productive and experienced greater academic growth in block scheduling. Students strongly believed there were more opportunities for academic growth in block scheduling. Twenty-five percent of the teachers felt students had greater accommodations for learning styles in a block schedule. Seventy-two percent of the teachers strongly agreed the school climate was more positive in a block schedule. Students (22%) also felt there was a more positive climate in the block schedule environment. The findings of this study provide school decision makers with evidence of the preferred learning schedule of students and teachers.
|Commitee:||Grover, Kathy, Spencer, Tina|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||DAI-A 82/1(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Secondary education, Educational evaluation|
|Keywords:||Learning schedules, Time management Practices|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be