According to United States law, international F-1 students are nonimmigrant aliens residing in the United States temporarily. Yet, they are more than just short-term visitors, as many of them live in the country for years while pursuing their postsecondary studies. Since international students are foreign citizens, their rights and freedoms are bound by the constraints of the country’s immigration policies. This study is concerned with work-related restrictions imposed on F-1 students by the U.S. government, positioning international students’ limited opportunities for employment as being in violation with their basic human right to economic and social development.
This multi-method project drew upon human rights and capabilities frameworks and combined policy analysis with primary data to investigate the lived experiences of international students with respect to employment and opportunity. Based on a case study anchored in the New England region, it incorporated in-depth interviews and surveys with current and former international F-1 students (N = 38) who were engaged in the workforce while pursuing their studies and residing in the United States. In addition, multi-site data collection included interviews with 22 stakeholders, such as international student advisors and members of international student advocacy organizations, whose contributions presented student experiences from a completely different angle.
Founded in the transdisciplinary research process, this investigation took into account theoretical frameworks from the fields of higher education, labor studies, immigration policy and human rights. A case study method was chosen due to its effectiveness in the application towards policy evaluation where no reliable measures of its impact and adequacy currently exist. Data collection focused on international students’ socio-economic well-being as well as their coping strategies in the face of employment-related immigration policies. The findings reveal that highly restrictive immigration policies had a negative impact on the livelihoods of international F-1 students, fostered exclusion and exploitation, forced students to engage in unauthorized labor, and created continuous financial struggles. Recommendations call for policy change and for the utilization of a more holistic approach in researching international students’ issues.
|Commitee:||Blanco, Gerardo, Ross, Donald|
|School:||University of Massachusetts Boston|
|Department:||Global Inclusion and Social Development (PhD)|
|School Location:||United States -- Massachusetts|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/12(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Higher education, International law, Public policy|
|Keywords:||Human rights, Immigration law, International students, Right to development, Right to work, Work restrictions|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be