The larger frame of this study contributes to the literature that examines how educators negotiate, contest, appropriate, and reconstruct federal and state-level policy in their classrooms. More specifically, the study contributes to the field of language education policy, and in particular to how educators make sense of, and implement, English Language Development (ELD) Standards. I focus on WIDA ELD Standards, as they are currently in use in 42 U.S. states, territories, and federal agencies as well as more than 500 international schools throughout the world. The literature review identifies a problem for standards-based education systems using the 2012 WIDA Standards Framework: various reports show that they are not sufficiently user-friendly in their design to be meaningfully operationalized by educators designing curriculum in practice, leaving many to either ignore them altogether or to ask for additional help from standards-setting organizations and state departments of education, and requiring a locally-created “extra layer” to be used. This study focuses on how one such locally-created “extra-layer,” the Next Generation English-as-a-Second-Language Project and its Collaboration Tool, might facilitate processes to promote the simultaneous development of language and content, a central aspect of the WIDA ELD standards. I approach this study through a critical democratic theoretical framework coupled with a conceptual framework that sees policy as a social practice of power. Together, these frameworks open up spaces to consider how educators maneuver power to creatively and intentionally engage with policy in their classrooms.
Findings indicate that educators would feel better supported in operationalizing WIDA ELD standards if they further specified language functions, features, forms, and genres from the context of disciplinary learning, and if they were presented in a more streamlined, actionable, and user-friendly way. Ultimately, the study underscores the importance of developing greater authentic dialogue and genuine democratic practices in policymaking, and underscores the importance of reflective spaces that support educators in unpacking sociocultural, sociohistorical, and sociopolitical aspects of education and the world surrounding it.
Implications of this study can inform policy processes, educator preparation programs, professional development offerings, and the design of future language development standards and related tools.
|Commitee:||Krueger Henney, Patricia, Chun, Christian|
|School:||University of Massachusetts Boston|
|Department:||Urban Education (EdD, PhD)|
|School Location:||United States -- Massachusetts|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/12(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Education Policy, Bilingual education, English as a Second Language|
|Keywords:||Bilingual, English language development (ELD) standards, English language proficiency (ELP) standards, English learners, Language education policy, WIDA|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be