The History of the Doctoral Program in Organizational Leadership at Brandman University From an Innovation Theory Perspective: Beta Cohort 2013-
Zeta Cohort 2017
Purpose Statement. The purpose of this historical research study was to document the evolution of the Doctoral Program in Organizational Leadership at Brandman University from concept and design to implementation to present iterations (2013-2017). In addition, it was the purpose of this study to examine changes in vision, structure, curriculum, and the factors that influenced key leaders and decisions from the perspective of Bolman and Deal's 4-frame model, including structural, human resource, political, and symbolic frames.
Methodology. This study is part of a 2-person thematic qualitative historical study on the Brandman doctoral program, with 1 researcher studying program design and implementation with the Alpha cohort in 2012, and this researcher studying the evolution of the program from the Beta cohort of 2013 through the Zeta cohort of 2017. Interviews were conducted with 16 key leaders of the program during the time period being studied. Additionally, relevant documents, artifacts, and relics were reviewed to triangulate interview data.
Findings. Findings of this research study relate to the importance of leaders using a variety of frames through which to view their organization and make strategic leadership decisions regarding systematically pursuing innovation. Additionally, the findings address the importance of aligning hiring practices and program structures to the core values and mission of the organization.
Conclusions. Utilizing Bolman and Deal’s 4-frame model, the Brandman University Doctoral Program in Organizational Leadership was evaluated in terms of its innovative approach to doctoral education. The program’s focus on transformational leadership offered in a practitioner scholar environment exemplified alignment between theory and practice.
Recommendations. Further study is recommended to determine the impact of the Brandman doctoral program. Recommendations include studies focused on the role of the human resources frame in the evolution of the program; impact of student transformational change projects (TCPs); evaluation of quantitative program data; analysis of the perspectives of other members of the Brandman University community; replication of this historical study, focusing on the years following 2017; and examination of the role of the Brandman University Center for Instructional Innovation (CII).
|Commitee:||Buster, Walter, Petersen, Cindy|
|Department:||School of Education|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/11(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational leadership, Higher Education Administration, Higher education|
|Keywords:||Doctoral, Innovation, Leadership, Organizational|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be