Research has shown that reading intervention which incorporates word identification strategy instruction can help struggling students improve their reading ability (e.g., Gelzheiser, Scanlon, Vellutino et al., 2011; Scanlon, Gelzheiser, Vellutino et al., 2008; Vellutino, Scanlon, Small, et al., 2006). Since poor readers have benefited from interventions which include direct instruction of word identification strategies, my research focused on word identification strategy instruction; specifically, this study examined the types of scaffolds teachers provided to readers as they practiced being strategic word solvers while reading. This study compared the in-situ conversations between teachers using the Interactive Strategies Approach – Extended (ISA—X, Gelzheiser et al., 2019), while working with 3rd and 4th grade students identified as having reading difficulties. I examined the responses provided by teachers to student miscues while reading. Responses made by two ISA-X teachers who demonstrated average success in accelerating their students reading skills were compared to responses made by two more effective ISA—X teachers. Similarities and differences in the types of responses and the length of word solving cycles were explored. Findings suggest more effective teachers differed from average teachers in two ways, the contingency of the initial teacher response to readers’ needs and the average number of teacher responses within a word solving cycle. Potential instructional implications are discussed.
|Advisor:||Quinn, Kevin, Scanlon, Donna M|
|Commitee:||Domaracki, Jane, Gelzheiser, Lynn M|
|School:||State University of New York at Albany|
|Department:||Educational Psychology and Methodology|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/11(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Reading instruction, Teacher education, Special education|
|Keywords:||Interactive strategies approach, Reading difficulties, Reading instruction, Reading intervention, Teacher scaffolds, Word identification strategies|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be