Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, disability, and cost globally and in the United States. Various sources point to women experiencing greater morbidity, increased health care resource use and higher incidence of mortality resultant from COPD. While exact causality is not fully understood, it is possible that social bias towards COPD in women impacting screening and timely diagnosis may be a contributing factor. This current investigation involved the social ecological model. In this cross-sectional secondary analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2017 data, differences in screening through use of breathing testing among 6334 males and females who have knowledge of COPD were assessed through descriptive statistics, Pearson’s chi-squared test, and binomial logistic regression (BLR). Bivariate analysis indicated a marginally significant association between sex and participation in breathing tests (χ2 = 3.44, p = 0.063), disproportionately impacting women who used tests less. According to BLR models, females were 15.9% more likely not to take the breathing tests compared to males (OR = .841, CI 95%: 0.739-0.961) adjusted for COPD symptoms, and females were 11.7% more likely not to take the breathing test when controlling for healthcare coverage, but this result was marginally significant (OR=.883 CI 95%: .775-1.007). This study can offer insight into the use and patterns of breathing testing among the US population while further describing potential gaps in care, serving as catalyst towards driving necessary education, policy development and broader social change.
|Commitee:||Connors, Jeanne, Onyejekwe, Egondu, Subocz, Sue|
|School Location:||United States -- Minnesota|
|Source:||DAI-B 81/10(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD in women, Lung function in women, Sex bias ion COPD|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be