Purpose: The purpose of this qualitative and illustrative multiple case study was to identify and describe succession planning strategies utilized by six K-12 California public school districts of 1,000 to 10,000 enrollment that have experienced superintendent transitions within the previous 3 years during three stages—Prepare, Pivot, Thrive—of executive succession and transition management (Adams, 2006).
Methodology: The population consisted of 1,022 districts with a target population of 213 districts. Participants (superintendents, cabinet members, board members) were chosen through purposive and convenience sampling.
Findings: Five common themes emerged: (a) communication, (b) seeking input, (c) relationship-building, (d) strategic planning, and (e) stabilizing the district. In contrast, common themes by role and stage include: Superintendents: (a) relationship-building, (b) communication, (c) strategic planning, (d) seeking input, (e) research, and (f) balancing work in 2 districts. Cabinet members: (a) communication, (b) relationship-building, (c) stabilizing the district, (d) strategic planning, (e) managing change, and (f) seeking input. Board members: (a) seeking input, (b) communication, (c) showing support, (d) relationship-building, (e) strategic planning, and (f) managing change.
Conclusions: The study identified strategies consistently used across all roles and stages. However, different roles identified unique strategies per transition stage. Superintendent succession planning should include strategies used collaboratively during the Thrive stage.
Recommendations: Future research is recommended on the impact of succession planning on superintendent tenure, case studies on experiences of cabinet/board members during transitions, nexus of board elections and superintendent transitions, replication of the study on principals and qualitative studies on the role of the outgoing superintendents.
|Commitee:||Giokaris, George, Greenberg, Jonathan|
|Department:||School of Education|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/9(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational leadership, Educational administration|
|Keywords:||Succession, Succession plan, Superintendent, Superintendent succession, Transition|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be