Purpose: The purpose of this explanatory sequential mixed methods study was to identify and describe perceived political styles of school board members and the strategies superintendents employ to work with them.
Methodology: This explanatory sequential mixed methods study analyzed quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to answer the research questions in regard to the political styles of exemplary rural elementary superintendents and school boards and the political strategies superintendents use to engage with their school board members.
Findings: Examination of mixed methods data from the five school districts participating in this study indicated a variety of findings. The major strategies exemplary rural superintendents of elementary school districts used to work with the political styles of board members were categorized into four themes, including communication, relationships, governance training, and personal mastery.
Conclusions: It is concluded that rural elementary superintendents who communicate by establishing regular contact, listening actively and strategically, and anticipating the needs of board members are more effective. Additionally, rural elementary superintendents who build relationships by showing respect and being honest and transparent build more trusting relationships with board members. Providing learning opportunities for board members to understand their roles, responsibilities, and governance practices and policies will result in more efficient working relationships between the superintendent and board members. Finally, rural elementary superintendents who implement strategies to manage their emotions through reflection are better positioned to negotiate conflict, allow time for processing, and allow board members to lead.
Recommendations: Further research is recommended to understand the scope of research conducted in the political styles thematic; understand political styles from the perspective of board members; understand the most effective ways to implement this research through professional learning opportunities; differentiate findings by setting (urban, rural, and suburban); and identify strategies specific demographics such as female leaders or superintendents of county offices of education use.
|Commitee:||Sziraki, George, Wilson, Marylou|
|Department:||School of Education|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/9(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational leadership, Educational administration, Education Policy|
|Keywords:||Governance, Leadership, Relationships, Strategies, Styles, Superintendent|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be