Anonymity plays a vital role in modern societies. Using the protective cloak of anonymity, whistle-blowers are able to raise concern over worrying activities, journalists are able to protect their sources and investigate the powerful, abuse victims can seek help without fear that they will be discovered by their abusers, immigrants can seek advice on their legal situations, and other at-risk populations can remain safe. The most widely-used anonymity system on the Internet today is Tor, and like all anonymity systems it is dependent on having a large anonymity set, or set of indistinguishable users, in order to provide anonymity. This makes usability and user experience extremely important for anonymity. The more usable a system is, and the better experience it provides to its users, the larger the anonymity set can grow.
In this thesis we examine the usability and user experience of Tor from three perspectives. First we study how well users understand the software that they are using by studying their mental models of the Tor network. We find that experts and non-experts have different understandings of the internal workings of the Tor anonymity network, with experts having a more complete model of it as a complex network and focusing on the networking portion, while non-experts focus on the Tor Browser as a black box
service. Both experts and non-experts show gaps in their mental models that can lead to misuse of the software.
Next we examine the User eXperience (UX) flaws of the Tor Browser. We asked participants that resembled a new, non-technical user base of Tor to use the Tor Browser as their default browser for a period of 7 days. During this time we spawned a survey for them to fill out every time they finished browsing. From these surveys, some semi-structured interviews, and some write-ups we discovered that Tor Browser users face multiple issues, including broken functionality, differential treatment, geo-location issues, and more.
The results and insights gained from each of these projects have been reported to the Tor Project, and have influenced decisions in the design of the Tor Browser. Other changes are in discussion for being implemented.
|Advisor:||Memon, Nasir, Dolan-Gavitt, Brendan|
|Commitee:||McCoy, Damon, Patil, Sameer|
|School:||New York University Tandon School of Engineering|
|Department:||Computer Science and Engineering|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-B 81/9(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Anonymity, Privacy, Tor, Usability, UX|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be