For nearly 30 years, education has been researching and implementing practices and teacher strategies to better support students to engage in more meaningful interactions with mathematics. In particular, moving away from teacher-centered approaches to mathematics learning and into more student-centered ones has been a focus. Whole-class discussions have been the subject of investigation in much of this research. Studying how teachers can better support students to discuss their perspectives on, work within, and pose questions about the mathematics of study has been one line of inquiry. Students need to have opportunities to make sense of the mathematics–to make decisions about what strategies to use, to engage with one another’s ideas, and to productively struggle to reach new, more complete understandings. Similar sense making-driven efforts in science education research have used the sociological construct of framing (Goffman, 1974) to examine students’ interactions with one another, the content, and their teachers (i.e., Hammer et al., 2005). My aim was to further understand a teacher’s work of framing and how that may or may not influence students’ interactions around the mathematics, particularly their engagement in sense making during whole-class discussions. To do so, I employed an explanatory case study design to study a 6th grade mathematics classroom. Based on a detailed micro-analysis of three videotaped lessons as well as teacher and student interviews, this study’s logic of inquiry followed six different phases. The analysis revealed that the teacher’s framing in this classroom mattered for the ways in which her students framed the activity and engaged in sense-making activity. Specifically, when the teacher framed the activity as a sense-making endeavor in which they were expected to be the authority, co-construct mathematical explanations, and to engage in productive struggle, the students did so. When the teacher engaged in less productive framings that were more teacher-centered, the students aligned with that framing as well. The implications of this study for teacher practice include the need to support teachers in setting, and holding, interactional expectations. In addition, supporting students to reach those expectations through particular framings is an added layer to consider beyond instructional practices.
|Commitee:||Ansell, Ellen, Kiesling, Scott, Munter, Chuck, Wallace, Tanner|
|School:||University of Pittsburgh|
|Department:||School of Education|
|School Location:||United States -- Pennsylvania|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/7(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Mathematics education, Middle School education|
|Keywords:||Sense making, Whole-class mathematics discussions|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be