Man-made structures over the time have been prone to failures due to natural calamities and disasters causing huge amounts of life and material losses. One of the most common disasters that strike are earthquakes damaging the infrastructures with a different and unpredictable pattern each time. To understand the mechanism of failure and its effect numerical study on cantilever wall for different earthquakes was done by (Osouli & Zamiran, 2017). The aim of the study was focused on the cohesion of the backfill material and its effect on the failure of wall. Upon literature review the need to expand it beyond cantilever wall was realized. Cantilever wall and gravity wall are different in terms of shape, purpose and mechanism, but are they different in terms of failures and how does the backfill cohesion come in role was the question. The primary focus of the study is to model performance of a gravity wall backfilled with materials that have various cohesions under three different earthquake loading inputs. Verification of the work was a step by step process of a literature review followed by understanding the input codes used by (Osouli & Zamiran, 2017) in their study. The input earthquake velocities used in the study were checked for any corrections in (Seismosoft, 2016) software. The codes were then individually input in FLAC 2D software from (Itasca, 2011)and numerical analyses was performed, the output of the analyses was then extracted, and figures were generated in Microsoft excel to compare them with the original results. . The backfill cohesions are varied from 0 kPa to 30 kPa to understand the effect of their variation on the wall performance. Loma Prieta, Kobe and Chi-Chi earthquakes inputs are used for the dynamic analysis. The wall is modeled using the finite difference method. The monitored performance of the wall included seismic earth pressures, peak ground accelerations, relative wall displacement, total and incremental seismic earth thrust and point of action on the wall. The results are compared to that of the cantilever wall with same backfill cohesions. Both the gravity and cantilever walls are 6 meters high. The relation between total and incremental seismic earth thrust coefficients and backfill cohesions is closely monitored. The results indicated that in general as the backfill cohesion increased from 0 to 30 kPa the total seismic earth thrust coefficient decreased for the stem section of the wall however as the cohesion increased the results also increased for the heel section of the wall. The incremental seismic earth thrust of the wall decreased with the increase in backfill cohesion of the wall for both stem and heel.
|Commitee:||Fries, Ryan, Benjankar, Rohan|
|School:||Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville|
|School Location:||United States -- Illinois|
|Source:||MAI 81/7(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Geotechnology, Civil engineering|
|Keywords:||Cantilever wall, FDA, FLAC 2D, Gravity wall, Numerical modelling|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be